Health Alert: Breast Milk Purchased Online Is “Unpasterized” And May Contain Hep B, C and Syphilis

Body builders, fetishits, cancer patients are calling it ‘liquid gold’ for its energy boosting power and while it’s a booming market supplying breast milk to mothers who have difficulty producing their own, it may be lethal for your baby. Health experts are warning mothers from purchasing the milk online as its unpastuerized and could carry dangrous germs.

Dr Sarah Steele, author of one of a report in the Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine says 93% of breast milk sold online contains detectable levels of bacteria, as non-sterile equipment is used to express or store the milk. One of the threats include hepatitis B and C, HIV and syphilis.

The Queen Mary University of London team claims claims that the milk boosted the immune system were misleading and could be dangerous to cancer patients.

It is unclear how much of the product – often called “liquid gold” – is being traded, as it is always an arrangement between two parties. Dr Sarah Steele, from Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, told the BBC News website the market had “shown consistent growth around the world”.

But Dr Steele said breast milk did not have the same rigorous safety standards as anything sold as food. She was particularly worried about the milk being marketed at cancer patients. She added: “For cancer patients and other immuno-compromised people, the immune system is not functioning the same as in a healthy adult.

“It is advertised with an immune benefit, but actually it poses real risks, and you’re exposing yourself to bacteria and viruses that could complicate the medical condition in a dangerous way.”

One of the websites that facilitates its sale,, told the BBC it advised all milk be pasteurised before use and that most members were honest and “simply looking to provide safe milk for babies in need”.

A representative added: “Those conducting the study did not follow our posted safety guidelines, [which] potentially skewed the results of the study.”


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *