Military Suicides have no direct relation with tour of duty, study

Suicide counts have nearly doubled in the last 10 years in certain branches of the military.

The recent study publicized in the journal JAMA Psychiatry proposes that the causes are much more complex than just deployment. The study came across all 3.9 million associates of the U.S. military from 2001-2007 counting the Air Force, Army, Army National Guard, Army Reserve, Marine Corps and Navy concluding that suicide was not linked with the deployment in the U.S. The two latest main conflicts are Operation Enduring Freedom and Operation Iraqi Freedom.

Says research writer Mark A. Reger, PhD, Deputy Director at the National Center for Telehealth and Technology and head of research, those findings may be contradicting to results and investigations, however several appealing theories have appeared.

Reger said, “As the wars went on and deployments were occurring among our service members, the suicide rates were rising at the same time, so it’s very tempting to assume that it must be because of the deployment.” He added that however, the firmest study from the Vietnam and Gulf War eras illustrates there’s no considerable disparity in suicide counts among those who are deployed and the general population. And that held correct for the more current conflicts. The writers came across at deployment in the Iraq and Afghanistan mission and established no connection among deployment and suicide.

Part of the motive is that military associates who are selected for deployment may be amongst the most psychologically fit, Reger supposes. To guarantee that they’re psychologically and bodily prepared for the challenges, all service associates undergo pre-deployment testing prior to deployment. “It is possible that those who deploy are healthier than those who did not deploy,” says Reger.

The writers didn’t observe data associated to psychological health condition, medical condition, combat contact or combat damages, so they were incapable to see if those aspects were related to boost suicide threat. “All of these deserve future study,” says Reger. Although some patterns connected to suicide risk aspects did appear.

Those who left the military untimely had a 63% higher suicide count than people who had not alienated from service. People with the least years of military service were also most in danger; service associates who’s gone in the military after just a short period of below four years were at higher danger for suicide compared to those gone after serving more than four  years, despite of whether or not they’d been deployed.

The research didn’t check probable causes for this. However, the writers wondered that complexity finding job, losing their military individuality and having to seek new societal support may all take a part.

The research writers concluded that a further huge danger issue was the nature of a service associate’s release. Those who were not properly released from the military had a 21% elevated suicide count than those who had an admirable release.

Reger said that making use of restricted funds to avoid suicide is a key point of the military. Found on these results, it’s likely that aiming prevention attempts more hardly to those who depart the military untimely and those with an under-honorable release may be more effective and influencing than throwing a wide net and centering prevention attempts on each one who’s deployed.

“I think the entire nation has a responsibility for working with service members and veterans, wherever they end up. If our paper has the effect of influencing some of those in the prevention community beyond the military, that would be a good outcome,” says Reger.




Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *