Less than one-fifth of England’s bodies of water are considered environmentally Healthy, Study


Not as much as a fifth of England’s streams, lakes and rivers are healthy, figures have demonstrated, provoking calls from conservation groups for action to restore seaways.

The Environment Agency information uncovers only 17% of 3,763 water bodies surveyed are in great or high quality, while the same number of (15%) were in poor or awful condition.

The Blueprint for Water coalition of natural and fishing association named the figures “stunning”, and called for more action to restore streams through measures, for example, decreasing reflection and handling contamination from sewage works and streets.

The quantity of water bodies classed as in a decent biological status is a huge drop on figures discharged a year ago, which discovered 29% were in a decent state, with the decrease thought to be down to more robust observing.

The coalition is approaching general society to stand up for the waterways, lakes, wetlands and shorelines they cherish by reacting to the Environment Agency’s counsel on waterway basin administration plans for how conduits will be overseen throughout the following six years.

Janina Gray, the Salmon & Trout Association and Blueprint for Water executive, said: “The figures discharged today are stunning and reveal to us that things are more terrible than we suspected.

“Only 17% of England’s waterways are healthy. This is unsuitable and debilitates natural life and livelihoods. It is more imperative than ever that everybody gets included with this meeting.

“We’re asking everyone, as they plan their Easter break, to take two minutes to respond via the Save Our Waters website.”

Rose O’Neill, water strategy administrator, at WWF said: “It’s unmistakable that we are fizzling our streams and the natural life they affect.

“We have to see government action to restore these streams, for instance by diminishing deliberation and handling contamination from sewage works, ranches and streets.

“There’s still time to add your voice, but I’d urge everyone to respond quickly as the consultation ends in two weeks.”

Rob Cunningham, head of water policy at RSPB, added: “We shouldn’t ignore great efforts by wildlife groups, rivers trusts, water companies and others to make real improvements to our rivers, but we clearly need a step change if we are going to make meaningful progress on diffuse pollution, abstraction and physical damage, and that needs government to take action.”

A spokeswoman for the Environment Agency said that after “extensive” venture, streams in England were the healthiest for 20 years.

“EU legislation means the assessment criteria has just got even tougher and, in the same way that your car can fail its MOT for just one fault, a river won’t be classed as ’good’ unless it achieves the highest rating for a wide range of factors, including water chemistry, flow levels and aquatic life.”

She said very nearly seventy five percent of the tests being run were bringing about the most elevated two scores of great or high status, as an aftereffect of 10 years of diligent work to enhance the health of England’s rivers.

According to spokeswoman for the environment agency “The Environment Agency will continue to work closely with farmers, businesses and water companies to reduce pollution and improve water quality wherever, and however, possible,”



Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *